Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (6):1231-1248 (2021)

Jared Warren
Stanford University
In many ontological debates there is a familiar challenge. Consider a debate over X s. The “small” or anti-X side tries to show that they can paraphrase the pro-X or “big” side’s claims without any loss of expressive power. Typically though, when the big side adds whatever resources the small side used in their paraphrase, the symmetry breaks down. The big side plus small’s resources is a more expressively powerful and thus more theoretically fruitful theory. In this paper, I show that there is a very general solution to this problem, for the small side. Assuming the resources of set theory, small can successfully paraphrase big. This result depends on a theorem about models of set theory with urelements. After proving this theorem, I discuss some of its philosophical ramifications.
Keywords Ontology  Paraphrase  Metaontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10992-021-09597-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Material Beings.Peter van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Mind 100 (3):394-397.
Plural Predication.Thomas McKay - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paraphrase, Semantics, and Ontology.John A. Keller - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9.
Paraphrase and the Symmetry Objection.John A. Keller - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):365-378.
The Paraphrase Argument Against Collective Actions.Johannes Himmelreich - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1):81-95.
Paraphrase Strategies in Metaphysics.Tatjana von Solodkoff - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (8):570-582.
The Inconspicuous Role of Paraphrase.David Sherry - 1991 - History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (2):151-166.
Why Paraphrase Nihilism Fails.Shane Wilkins - 2016 - Synthese 193 (8):2619--2632.
Ontological Commitment and Paraphrase.Frank Jackson - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (213):303-315.
Parts as Counterparts.Aaron Cotnoir - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):228-241.
Métaphore et paraphrase.Palle Leth - 2007 - Archives de Philosophie 4 (4):579-598.
Problems of Paraphrase: Bottom's Dream.David Hills - 2007 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3.
Does Ontology Exist?Hans-Johann Glock - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (2):235-260.


Added to PP index

Total views
121 ( #95,396 of 2,498,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #41,014 of 2,498,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes