Retroductive Analogy: How to and How Not to Make Claims of Good Reasons to Believe in Evolutionary and Anti-Evolutionary Hypotheses [Book Review]

Argumentation 24 (1):71-84 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper describes an argumentative fallacy we call ‘Retroductive Analogy.’ It occurs when the ability of a favored hypothesis to explain some phenomena, together with the fact that hypotheses of a similar sort are well supported, is taken to be sufficient evidence to accept the hypothesis. This fallacy derives from the retroductive or abductive form of reasoning described by Charles Sanders Peirce. According to Peirce’s account, retroduction can provide good reasons to pursue a hypothesis but does not, by itself, provide good reasons to believe the hypothesis. In successful applications of retroduction, pursuit leads to the accumulation of evidence. In retroductive analogy, comparison with other successful hypotheses is substituted for the genuine pursuit of evidence. We describe a case from ecological genetics in which retroduction plays a legitimate role as the initial phase of an ongoing research program that serves to accumulate genuine evidence for a hypothesis. We also examine two contexts in which the fallacy of retroductive analogy occurs: in defenses of Intelligent Design Theory and in defense of some hypotheses in Evolutionary Psychology



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,528

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intelligent design and probability reasoning.Elliott Sober - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2):65-80.
Beyond the Hype: The Value of Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics.Armin W. Schulz - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):46-72.
Evolution of human jealousy a just-so story or a just-so criticism?Neven Sesardic - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):427-443.
Evolutionary psychiatry and depression: testing two hypotheses.Somogy Varga - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):41-52.
Historical evidence and human adaptations.Jonathan Kaplan - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 69:S294-S304.
Weighing the evidence in evolutionary biology. [REVIEW]Massimo Pigliucci - 2008 - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23 (12):662-663.
Syntax: An evolutionary stepchild.Danielle Dilkes & Steven M. Platek - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):511-512.


Added to PP

27 (#500,167)

6 months
5 (#241,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Steve Gimbel
Gettysburg College
Chuck Ward
Millersville University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations