Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):175–197 (2003)

Authors
Barry Ward
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Abstract
A novel motivation for a Humean projectivist construal of our concept of scientific law is provided. The analysis is partially developed and used to explain intuitions that are problematic for a Humean reductionist construal of lawhood. A possible non-Humean rejoinder is discussed and rejected. In an appendix, further intuitions that are problematic for Humean reductionists are explained projectively.
Keywords Law  Reductionism  Explanation  Supervenience  Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00169
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Blackwell.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Leis da Natureza.Eduardo Castro - 2013 - Compêndio Em Linha de Problemas de Filosofia Analítica.
Laws, Explanation, Governing, and Generation.Barry Ward - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):537 – 552.
Concepts of Law of Nature.Brendan Shea - 2011 - Dissertation, University of Illinois
General Solution to All Philosophical Problems With Some Exceptions.Wayde Beasley - forthcoming - north of parallel 40: Numerous uncommitted.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
191 ( #52,887 of 2,439,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,981 of 2,439,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes