Analyse & Kritik 10 (3):3-31 (1988)
AbstractThe question of how to define the concept of social power has been a focus of controversy among social theorists. In this paper, I put forward a definition of social power that avoids many of the pitfalls of previous attempts at such a definition. Roughly, I define the power which one agent has over another as the ability that the dominant agent has to control the situation within which the subservient agent acts. Using this basic definition of power, I go on to define many of the central forms in which power actually exists, forms that are conceptualized by such concepts as force, coercion, and influence. I show that these different forms of power can all be understood as specifications of the generic definition of power that I offered and go on to develop an account of how they function in relation to one another in actual relationship of social power
Similar books and articles
[Book Review] the Forms of Power, From Domination to Transformation. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Wartenberg - 1991 - Social Theory and Practice 17:105-130.
A General Theory of Gender Stratification.Rae Lesser Blumberg - 1984 - Sociological Theory 2:23-101.
The Forms of Power and the Forms of Cities: Building on Charles Tilly. [REVIEW]Peter Marcuse - 2010 - Theory and Society 39 (3-4):471-485.
The Sound of Little Hummingbird Wings: A Wittgensteinian Investigation of Forms of Life as Forms of Power.Wendy Lee-Lampshire - 1999 - Feminist Studies 25 (2):409.
Democracy and the Persistence of Power.Preston King - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):93-112.
Forms of Resistance: Foucault on Tactical Reversal and Self-Formation. [REVIEW]Kevin Thompson - 2003 - Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2):113-138.
Kierkegaard's Critique of the Bourgeois State.Robert L. Perkins - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):207 – 218.
Rousseau y el concepto de soberanía popular.Georg Zenkert - 2000 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 12 (2):81-109.
Parts, Wholes, and Presence by Power A Response to Gordon P. Barnes.Michael Hector Storck - 2008 - Review of Metaphysics 62 (1):45-59.
Distinguishing the Power of Agency From Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the "Black Box" of Personal Agency.Colin Campbell - 2009 - Sociological Theory 27 (4):407 - 418.
Is the Foucauldian Conception of Disciplinary Power Still at Work in Contemporary Forms of Imprisonment?Craig W. J. Minogue - 2011 - Foucault Studies 11:179-193.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Freedom as Critique: Foucault Beyond Anarchism.Karsten Schubert - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (5):634-660.
The Ambiguity of Love: Beauvoir, Honneth and Arendt on the Relation Between Recognition, Power and Violence.Federica Gregoratto - 2018 - Critical Horizons 19 (1):18-34.
Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge.Francis Remedios - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463.
‘Mutual Obligation’ and ‘New Deal’: Illegitimate and Unjustified?Jeremy Moss - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (1):87-104.
Terrible Knowledge And Tertiary Trauma, Part I: Teaching About Japanese Nuclear Trauma And Resistance To The Atomic Bomb.Mara Miller - 2013 - The Clearing HouseHouse 86 (05):157-163.
References found in this work
No references found.