Ratio Juris 19 (2):127-140 (2006)
This article provides a critical introduction to an issue fo Ratio Juris concerend with two contrasting schools of legal idealism: the so-called Sheffield School (Beyleveld, Brownsword and colleagues) and the “discourse ethics” school of Habermas and Alexy. The article focusses on four issues: (1) whether a "claim to correctness" is a necessary feature of law, (2) the connection between correctness and validity, (3) Alexy's argument for a "qualifying connection" between law and morality, and its counterpart in the Sheffield School's approach, and (4) Alexy's case for the "Radbruch formula": that "extreme injustice is not law”. While rejecting both versions of the case for legal idealism, I argue that both schools offer vaulable, and broadly similar, insights into what makes a legal system morally legitimate.
|Keywords||legal positivism legal idealism discourse ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas - 1996 - Polity.
Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics.Joseph Raz - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings.Matthew H. Kramer - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Sheffield School and Discourse Theory: Divergences and Similarities in Legal Idealism/Anti-Positivism.Bev Clucas - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (2):230-244.
Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective.Paula Gaido - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):381-392.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?').Francois Chevrette & Hugo Cyr - unknown
When Is a Regime Not a Legal System? Alexy on Moral Correctness and Social Efficacy.David H. McIlroy - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):65-84.
On Relationships Between the Logic of Law, Legal Positivism and Semiotics of Law.Vadim Verenich - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2-4):145-195.
Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments.Vittorio Villa - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Neil MacCormick's Second Thoughts on Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. A Defence of the Original View.Aldo Schiavello - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (2):140-155.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads24 ( #212,947 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?