Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (1):50-66 (2015)

This article proposes an approach to educational distribution that attempts to minimise enduring tensions among conflicting values. At the foundation of this approach is a threshold of educational adequacy based on what is needed for citizens to participate in a democratic society. This threshold is justified because it minimises conflict with parental rights and because it better manages ‘the bottomless pit’ problem of educational distribution. This threshold is then modified to stipulate that, after the threshold has been reached, public resources should be distributed equally across students from all backgrounds. While this modification is essential to sending messages of equal citizenship, it also leaves a ‘moral residue’ because it allows wealthy parents to invest greater private resources in their children, thus preserving their children's competitive advantage. Minimising this harm requires policy mechanisms outside of schools that more aggressively break the link between educational outcomes, success in market competition, and social goods. Something ‘external’ to educational institutions is necessary, then, for the achievement of educational justice
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12066
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,385
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Private Education, Positional Goods, and the Arms Race Problem.Daniel Halliday - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (2):150-169.
Educational Adequacy and Educational Equality: A Merging Proposal.Fernando De-Los-Santos-Menéndez - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Philosophy of Education.D. C. Phillips - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Positional Goods and Upstream Agency.Daniel Halliday & Keith Hankins - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):279-293.
Educational Adequacy and Educational Equality: A Merging Proposal.Fernando de los Santos Menéndez - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Educational Equality: Luck Egalitarian, Pluralist and Complex.John Calvert - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (1):69-85.
Parental Involvement in Catholic Schools: A Case of Increasing Conflict.James Arthur - 1994 - British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (2):174 - 190.
Justice and the Threshold of Educational Equality.Randall Curren - 1994 - Philosophy of Education 50:239-248.
Why Should States Fund Schools?Harry Brighouse - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (2):138 - 152.
Parental Choice in Israel's Educational System: Theory Vs. Praxis. [REVIEW]Yossi Yonah - 2000 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 19 (5/6):445-464.
The 'Second Chance' Myth: Equality of Opportunity in Irish Adult Education Policies.Bernie Grummell - 2007 - British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (2):182 - 201.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #604,139 of 2,362,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #365,278 of 2,362,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes