Capacity for Preferences: Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision‐Making

Hastings Center Report 48 (3):31-39 (2018)
Authors
Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.853
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,475
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Respect for Persons.Sarah Buss - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):517-550.
Dementia and Dignity: Towards a New Method of Surrogate Decision Making.Elysa R. Koppelman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Decision Making Capacity Should Not Be Decisive in Emergencies.Dieneke Hubbeling - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2):229-238.
Interactive Capacity, Decisional Capacity, and a Dilemma for Surrogates.Vanessa Carbonell - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4):36-37.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-29

Total downloads
2 ( #933,504 of 2,286,052 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #232,412 of 2,286,052 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature