On Emotion and the Emotions: A Comment to Dixon, Mulligan and Scherer, and Scarantino

Emotion Review 4 (4):385-386 (2012)

Abstract
One reason why the debate about “emotion” runs into a dead end is that the second historical source which considered “emotion” as a cognitive function in the late 19th century was forgotten in Anglo-American psychology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073912445821
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,608
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How to Define Emotions Scientifically.Andrea Scarantino - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):358-368.
“Emotion”: The History of a Keyword in Crisis.Thomas Dixon - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):1754073912445814.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

“Emotion”: One Word, Many Concepts.Thomas Dixon - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):387-388.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-02

Total views
15 ( #531,289 of 2,249,277 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #605,367 of 2,249,277 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature