Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists’ professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives

Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (2):144-149 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The field of clinical bioethics strongly advocates for the use of advance directives to promote patient autonomy, particularly at the end of life. This paper reports a study of clinical bioethicists’ perceptions of the professional consensus about advance directives, as well as their personal advance care planning practices. We find that clinical bioethicists are often sceptical about the value of advance directives, and their personal choices about advance directives often deviate from what clinical ethicists acknowledge to be their profession’s recommendations. Moreover, our respondents identified a pluralistic set of justifications for completing treatment directives and designating surrogates, even while the consensus view focuses on patient autonomy. Our results suggest important revisions to academic discussion and public-facing advocacy about advance care planning.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Descendants and Advance Directives.Christopher Buford - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):217-231.
The Bioethical Underpinnings of Advance Directives.Yvonne Johnson - 2009 - Ethics and Social Welfare 3 (1):32-53.


Added to PP

14 (#724,702)

6 months
6 (#122,892)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University
Tyler Gibb
Western Michigan University School Of Medicine
Jason Adam Wasserman
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations