American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):98-100 (2020)

Authors
Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University
Jason Adam Wasserman
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
Abstract
We agree with Emily Walsh (2020) that the current preferences of patients with dementia should sometimes supersede those patients’ advance directives. We also agree that consensus clinical ethics guidance does a poor job of explaining the moral value of such patients’ preferences. Furthermore, Walsh correctly notes that clinicians are often averse to treating patients with dementia over their objections, and that this aversion reflects clinical wisdom that can inform revisions to clinical ethics guidance. But Walsh’s account of the moral value of the preferences of patients with dementia suffers from three major problems: (1) it does not engage the actual practices of clinical ethics; (2) it provides an inadequate account of why these patients’ preferences matter; and (3) it offers a poor explanation of clinicians’ intuitions in these cases. Her arguments engage a philosophical debate that is largely irrelevant to clinical practice and she therefore leaves pressing real-world clinical ethics questions unaddressed. After underscoring some of Walsh’s main points, we will discuss each of these shortcomings.
Keywords informed consent  dementia
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2020.1782528
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Transformative Experience.L. A. Paul - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Inductive Risk and Values in Science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indeterminacy of Identity and Advance Directives for Death After Dementia.Andrew Sneddon - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (4):705-715.
Advance Directives in Canada.Alister Browne & Bill Sullivan - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):256-260.
Advance Directives for Dementia Can Survive Altered Preferences.Paul T. Menzel - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):80-82.
The Importance of Patient’s Autonomy.Ana Ylenia Guerra Vaquero - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:43-47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-07

Total views
17 ( #621,716 of 2,461,909 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,784 of 2,461,909 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes