Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):5-36 (1998)
Former discussions of biological generalizations have focused on the question of whether there are universal laws of biology. These discussions typically analyzed generalizations out of their investigative and explanatory contexts and concluded that whatever biological generalizations are, they are not universal laws. The aim of this paper is to explain what biological generalizations are by shifting attention towards the contexts in which they are drawn. I argue that within the context of any particular biological explanation or investigation, biologists employ two types of generations. One type identifies causal regularities exhibited by particular kinds of biological entities. The other type identifies how these entities are distributed in the biological world.
|Keywords||causal contingent distribution essentialism explanation generalization kind law regularity ultimate and proximate explanation universal|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
What Was Classical Genetics?C. Kenneth Waters - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (4):783-809.
Terra Incognita: Explanation and Reduction in Earth Science.Maarten G. Kleinhans, Chris J. J. Buskes & Henk W. de Regt - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):289 – 317.
Physical Explanations and Biological Explanations, Empirical Laws and a Priori Laws.Joel Press - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):359-374.
Causation by Concentration.Marco J. Nathan - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (2):191-212.
Similar books and articles
The Units of Selection and the Causal Structure of the World.P. Kyle Stanford - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (2):215-233.
Laws of Biological Design: A Reply to John Beatty.Gregory J. Morgan - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):379-389.
The Causal Homogeneity of Biological Kinds.Michael Esfeld - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):421 - 433.
Sober and Elgin on Laws of Biology: A Critique. [REVIEW]Lane DesAutels - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):249-256.
How is Biological Explanation Possible?Alex Rosenberg - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):735-760.
Allometries and Scaling Laws Interpreted as Laws: A Reply to Elgin.Jani Raerinne - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):99-111.
Ceteris Paribus — an Inadequate Representation for Biological Contingency.Sandra D. Mitchell - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):329-350.
There May Be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, After All.Mehmet Elgin - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134.
Regularities and Causality; Generalizations and Causal Explanations.Jim Bogen - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (2):397-420.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #78,965 of 2,164,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?