Dilemmatic Deliberations In Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling

Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):174-189 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My central claim in this paper is that Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling is governed by the basic aim to articulate a real dilemma, and to elicit its proper recognition as such. I begin by indicating how Kierkegaard’s works are shaped in general by this aim, and what the aim involves. I then show how the dilemmaticstructure of Fear and Trembling is obscured in a recent dispute between Michelle Kosch and John Lippitt regarding the basic aims and upshot of the book. Finally, I consider two critical questions: Why does Kierkegaard present his dilemmatic reasoning in the form of a “dialectical lyric”? And why does he write a book that aims only to articulate a dilemma, and not also to resolve it?

Similar books and articles

Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling: A Critical Guide.Daniel Conway (ed.) - 2015 - [New York]: Cambridge University Press.
Ii. introduction to a reappraisal of fear and trembling.Paul Dietrichson - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):236 – 245.
Kierkegaard’s Regulative Sacrifice: A Post-Kantian Reading of Fear and Trembling.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):691-723.
Fear and Trembling.Jerome I. Gellmann - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Fear and Trembling.Jerome I. Gellmann - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Enough is Enough! "Fear and Trembling" is Not about Ethics.Ronald M. Green - 1993 - Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):191-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-01

Downloads
933 (#15,805)

6 months
98 (#49,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Watts
University of Essex

Citations of this work

The problem of Kierkegaard's socrates.Daniel Watts - 2017 - Res Philosophica (4):555-579.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references