Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):449-488 (2004)

Authors
Eric Watkins
University of California, San Diego
Abstract
: This paper argues that Kant's model of causality cannot consist in one temporally determinate event causing another, as Hume had thought, since such a model is inconsistent with mutual interaction, to which Kant is committed in the Third Analogy. Rather causality occurs when one substance actively exercises its causal powers according to the unchanging grounds that constitute its nature so as to determine a change of state of another substance. Because this model invokes unchanging grounds, one can understand how Kant could have thought that causal laws could be justified. Further, because this model, along with the broader ontology it presupposes, is radically different from Hume's, Kant's Second Analogy cannot be understood as a refutation of Hume's position on Hume's own terms; instead, Kant must be proposing an alternative view that competes against Hume's thoroughgoing empiricist account.
Keywords Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2004.0081
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant’s Response to Hume in the Second Analogy: A Critique of Gerd Buchdahl’s and Michael Friedman’s Accounts.Saniye Vatansever - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (2):310–346.
Kant on the Spontaneous Power of the Mind.John J. Callanan - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (3):565-588.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Categorical Requirements: Kant and Hume on the Idea of Duty.David Wiggins - 1995 - In Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence & Warren Quinn (eds.), The Monist. Clarendon Press. pp. 297-330.
Manfred Kuehn: Kant - A Biography. [REVIEW]Thomas Sturm - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):476-479.
Does Kant Refute Hume’s Derivation of the Concept of Cause?Gregg Osborne - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:293-318.
Intrinsic Natures: A Critique of Langton on Kant.Lucy Allais - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):143–169.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
230 ( #33,721 of 2,326,367 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,448 of 2,326,367 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes