Synthese 197 (8):3195-3213 (2020)

Marcus Willaschek
Goethe University Frankfurt
Even though Kant’s theory of cognition is central to his Critique of Pure Reason, it has rarely been asked what exactly Kant means by the term “cognition”. Against the widespread assumption that cognition can be identified with knowledge or if not, that knowledge is at least a species of cognition, we argue that the concepts of cognition and knowledge in Kant are not only distinct, but even disjunct. To show this, we first investigate Kant’s explicit characterizations of the nature of cognition. As it turns out, he introduces several different notions that must be carefully distinguished before identifying the one that is central to his project in the first Critique. We then consider the basic features of Kant’s conception of knowledge, indicating both how it involves assent and objective justification and how it relates to our contemporary conception. Next, we compare and contrast Kant’s understanding of cognition and his conception of knowledge in a way that allows us to present their fundamental differences and connections. We argue that while cognition, in the most relevant sense, is a species of representation that differs from other representations in that it involves the conceptual determination of a sensibly given object, knowledge is a kind of assent to a judgment that requires consciousness of a sufficient epistemic ground. Finally, by appreciating the differences between cognition and knowledge, we explain several of the implications this conception of cognition has for some of Kant’s main claims in the Critique of Pure Reason as a whole. Among other things, we show how Kant can deny cognition of specific things in themselves while allowing philosophical knowledge about things in themselves in general.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,880
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Kant and the Claims of Knowledge.Paul Guyer - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Making Kant's Empirical Realism Possible.Simon Gurofsky - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Chicago

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason.Patrick Kain - 2010 - In Benjamin Lipscomb & James Krueger (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. de Gruyter. pp. 211--230.
Kant's Philosophy of Language.Thomas Arthur Wilson - 1985 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Kant's Account of Cognition.Eric Watkins & Marcus Willaschek - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):83-112.
Givenness, Objective Reality, and A Priori Intuitions.Stefanie Grüne - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):113-130.
Kant on Cognition, Givenness, and Ignorance.Andrew Chignell - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):131-142.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #478,969 of 2,426,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #53,774 of 2,426,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes