This paper considers criticisms of the author's Science and Scepticism advanced by Fred D' Agostino, Graham Oddie, Elie Zahar, Alan Musgrave, and John Worrall. The criticisms concern the following topics: the aim of science, unified theoryhood, the empirical basis, corroboration by already known evidence, the idea that scientific theories need be no more than possibly true, and the pragmatic problem of induction. Various clarifications and improvements result, and on the last topic the author significantly modifies his position
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/42.3.343
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
What is a Law of Nature?David Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Patterns of Discovery.Karl R. Popper & Norwood R. Hanson - 1960 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (2):266-268.
What Is a Law of Nature?James Woodward - 1985 - Ethics 95 (4):949-951.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Natural Axiomatization: A Revision of 'Wajsberg's Requirement'.Elie Zahar - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):391-396.
Éxito predictivo y realismo.Manuel Comesaña - 2015 - Revista de filosofía (Chile) 71:23-30.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #182,204 of 2,498,211 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,211 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes