The Subjective Basis of Kant's Judgment of Taste

Abstract
Abstract Kant claims that the basis of a judgment of taste is a merely subjective representation and that the only merely subjective representations are feelings of pleasure or displeasure. Commentators disagree over how to interpret this claim. Some take it to mean that judgments about the beauty of an object depend only on the state of the judging subject. Others argue instead that, for Kant, the pleasure we take in a beautiful object is best understood as a response to its qualities, and that, accordingly, feelings of pleasure or displeasure are no different from other representations, such as colors or smells. While I agree that the judgment of taste is best understood as asserting a claim about an object's qualities, I argue that the distinction Kant makes between feelings of pleasure or displeasure and other representations should not be ignored. I show that one's liking or disliking for an object is merely subjective in the sense that its significance depends on what one has made of oneself through one's aesthetic education. The judgment of taste, then, is merely subjective because one must first become the kind of person whose feelings have the right significance at the right time before one can determine whether an object's qualities make it beautiful
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2011.592327
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Critique of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1790 - Barnes & Noble.
Kant and the Claims of Taste.Paul Guyer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant on Recognizing Beauty.Katalin Makkai - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):385-413.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.Melissa Zinkin - 2012 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (5):433-453.
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.Andrew Chignell - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
The Subjective Universality of Aesthetic Judgements Revisited.Bart Vandenabeele - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4):410-425.
Kantian Meta-Aesthetics and the Neglected Alternative.J. J. Tinguely - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (2):211-235.
Kant and the Claims of Taste.Paul Guyer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Aesthetic Judgment.Nick Zangwill - 2003 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kant on Recognizing Beauty.Katalin Makkai - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):385-413.
Kant's Beautiful Roses: A Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’.Miles Rind - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):65-74.
Added to PP index
2011-07-15

Total downloads
31 ( #168,535 of 2,180,849 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #68,026 of 2,180,849 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums