Topoi 37 (1):39-53 (2018)

Authors
Jamie Watson
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Abstract
Among social epistemologists, having a certain proportion of reliably formed beliefs in a subject matter is widely regarded as a necessary condition for cognitive expertise. This condition is motivated by the idea that expert testimony puts subjects in a better position than non-expert testimony to obtain knowledge about a subject matter. I offer three arguments showing that veritism is an inadequate account of expert authority because the reliable access condition renders expertise incapable of performing its social role. I then develop an alternative explanation of expert authority that I call the epistemic facility account, arguing that having a certain type of competence in a subject matter or domain of subject matters is sufficient for explaining expert authority while avoiding the problems with veritistic accounts.
Keywords Expertise  Veritism  Epistemic authority  Social epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-016-9421-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reflection and Disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Rethinking Expertise.H. M. Collins & Robert Evans - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
Knowledge and its Place in Nature.Hilary Kornblith - 2002 - Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On What It Takes to Be an Expert.Michel Croce - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):1-21.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"They Just Don't Get It!" When Family Disagrees with Expert Opinion.A. Ho - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):497-501.
Bioethics in a Legal Forum: Confessions of an "Expert" Witness.J. C. Fletcher - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):297-324.
Expert Opinion and Second‐Hand Knowledge.Matthew A. Benton - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (2):492-508.
English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony.Tony Ward - 2006 - Journal of Law and Society 33 (4):572-595.
Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority.Douglas Walton - 1997 - Pennsylvania State University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-03

Total views
87 ( #120,376 of 2,439,394 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #136,786 of 2,439,394 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes