American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1):73 - 81 (1982)
Abstract |
Descartes develops a science of matter, But not of mind. To develop a cartesian science of mind the author compares the idea of matter as empty space with the idea of mind as empty of content. Then he asks: what moves the mind? God introduces motion into matter to cause bodies which in turn act on the mind to cause or activate ideas. The motion of bodies is determined, But the mind is said to be free. He thus argues that descartes does not develop a science of mind because its unification with the science of matter would imply that the mind is not free
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cartesian Dualism.John Hawthorne - 2007 - In Peter van Inwagen & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Persons Human and Divine. Oxford University Press.
Dualism and its Importance for Medicine.Irene Switankowsky - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (6):567-580.
Non-Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism Without Reductionism.Eleonore Stump - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (4):505-531.
Mind-Body Dualism and the Biopsychosocial Model of Pain: What Did Descartes Really Say?Grant Duncan - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):485 – 513.
Descartes, Consciousness and Depersonalization: Viewing the History of Philosophy From a Strausian Perspective.Avner Cohen - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1):7-28.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-05-29
Total views
27 ( #420,353 of 2,498,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,957 of 2,498,140 )
2011-05-29
Total views
27 ( #420,353 of 2,498,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,957 of 2,498,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads