Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (10) (2013)
Many writers have held that in his later work, David Lewis adopted a theory of predicate meaning such that the meaning of a predicate is the most natural property that is (mostly) consistent with the way the predicate is used. That orthodox interpretation is shared by both supporters and critics of Lewis's theory of meaning, but it has recently been strongly criticised by Wolfgang Schwarz. In this paper, I accept many of Schwarze's criticisms of the orthodox interpretation, and add some more. But I also argue that the orthodox interpretation has a grain of truth in it, and seeing that helps us appreciate the strength of Lewis's late theory of meaning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen–Weymark Debate on Utilitarianism.Greaves Hilary - forthcoming - Utilitas:1-39.
Similar books and articles
Naturalness, Intrinsicality, and Duplication.Theodore Sider - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Analyses of Intrinsicality in Terms of Naturalness.Dan Marshall - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (8):531-542.
Overall Similarity, Natural Properties, and Paraphrases.Ghislain Guigon - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):387-399.
Lewis on Intentionality.Robert Stalnaker - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):199 – 212.
Parts, Classes and Parts of Classes : An Anti-Realist Reading of Lewisian Mereology.Neil Tennant - 2013 - Synthese 190 (4):709-742.
Added to index2012-02-15
Total downloads173 ( #26,089 of 2,163,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #18,036 of 2,163,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?