A reply to Peter Boghsonnian and James Lindsay's, ‘What comes after postmodernism?’


Authors
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00131857.2019.1585228
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Comes After Postmodernism?Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1498-1499.
Peter Boghossian—What Comes After Postmodernism?Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1346-1347.
Lacking Lack: A Reply to Joldersma.James D. Marshall - 2007 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (1):67-75.
Want to Be Good at Philosophy?Peter Boghossian & James A. Lindsay - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 73:22-27.
Reply to James Van Cleve. [REVIEW]Peter Unger - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):467-475.
Russell on Memory.Lindsay Judson - 1987 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88:65-82.
‘Ciris’.D'arcy Thompson - 1925 - Classical Quarterly 19 (3-4):155-158.
Uncertainty.James Franklin - 2006 - Encounter (ABC Radio National):0-0.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-03-02

Total views
11 ( #589,644 of 2,319,708 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #87,900 of 2,319,708 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature