Non-dualism, Infinite Regress Arguments and the “Weak Linguistic Principle”

Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):148-157 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Context: Is non-dualist epistemology, based on the unity of descriptions and objects, logically consistent? Problem: What is the status of the infinite regresses that the non-dualist Josef Mitterer, in his book The Beyond of Philosophy, censures in dualist thought? Their academic discussion is still in its infancy. Method: An attempt to reconstruct and differentiate Mitterer’s infinite regress accusations against dualism (originating from the 1970s) with today’s means and distinctions. Results: A weak and a strong linguistic principle are presented (non-dualism being subsumed under the strong linguistic principle), which are defined as such depending on whether the infinite regresses of dualism are interpreted as benign or as vicious. Implications: Further penetrating investigation of the infinite regresses highlighted by Mitterer is of crucial importance because these regresses have not yet been discussed and classified in relevant current publications on infinite regress arguments by authors such as Rescher or Gratton. Such proper classification is indispensable, however, if the value of the non-dualist alternative to, and its critique of, dualist thought is to be assessed adequately



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Viciousness and the structure of reality.Ricki Leigh Bliss - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):399-418.
Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):95-109.
Non-dualism: A New Understanding of Language.A. Riegler & S. Weber - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):139-142.
The Viciousness of Infinite Regresses.Claude Gratton - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:25-29.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Josef Mitterer and the Philosopher's Stone (Around His Neck).M. Dellwing - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):253-258.


Added to PP

32 (#502,492)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

/Non-Dualism/ continued.Thomas Hainscho - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):416-419.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references