Should Desert Replace Equality? Replies to Kagan

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3):1-28 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many people are moved by the thought that if A is worse off than B, then if we can improve the condition of one or the other but not both that it is better to improve the condition of A. Egalitarians are buoyed by the prevalence of such thoughts. But something other than egalitarianism could be driving these thoughts. In particular, such thoughts could be motivated, instead, by a combination of the belief that desert should determine how people fare and the belief that, for the most part, people are equally deserving. Shelly Kagan has pushed this line of argument, suggesting that desert should replace equality as a normative ideal. He argues that desert theory and egalitarianism often agree, and when they don’t intuition favors desert theory. A number of authors have offered responses to Kagan, including Serena Olsaretti, Fred Feldman, and Richard Arneson. However, I maintain that their responses are inadequate, primarily because they simply fail to capture the compelling intuitions that Kagan appeals to in making his case. There are other responses, however, and I consider three, each of which offers an egalitarian position that is compatible with Kagan’s most compelling intuitions. Thus, I maintain that Kagan has not sufficiently established that desert should replace equality as a normative ideal. There is still room for a genuinely egalitarian position, though Kagan’s reflections helpfully force egalitarians to further develop and refine their thinking

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,666

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should Desert Replace Equality? Replies to Kagan.by Michael Weber - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3).
Can Comparative Desert do Without Equality?Kerah Gordon-Solmon - 2015 - Philosophical Papers 44 (2):189-205.
Moving Mountains: Variations on a Theme by Shelly Kagan.Victor Tadros - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (2):393-405.
Comparative Desert Vs. Fairness.Kerah Gordon-Solmon - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (4):367-387.
Desert, Bell Motion, and Fairness.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):639-655.
Explaining the Geometry of Desert.Neil Feit & Stephen Kershnar - 2004 - Public Affairs Quarterly 18 (4):273-298.
Brute luck equality and desert.Peter Vallentyne - 2003 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and justice. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 169--185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
58 (#338,306)

6 months
13 (#206,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Weber
University of Houston

Citations of this work

Desert.Owen McLeod - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Imperialism of Desert.Ofer Malcai & Re'em Segev - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11:861-889.
Can Comparative Desert do Without Equality?Kerah Gordon-Solmon - 2015 - Philosophical Papers 44 (2):189-205.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references