History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (2):131-150 (1990)
Two main claims are defended. The first is that negative categorical statements are not to be accorded existential import insofar as they figure in the square of opposition. Against Kneale and others, it is argued that Aristotle formulates his o statements, for example, precisely to avoid existential commitment. This frees Aristotle's square from a recent charge of inconsistency. The second claim is that the logic proper provides much thinner evidence than has been supposed for what appears to be the received view, that is, for the view that insofar as they occur in syllogistic negative categoricals have existential import. At most there is a single piece of evidence in favor of the view?a special case of echthesis or the setting out of a case in proof
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
The Existential Assumptions of Traditional Logic.Dwayne Hudson Mulder - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):141-154.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle's Logic and the Quest for the Quantification of the Predicate.Bert Mosselmans - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):195-198.
Square of Opposition.Author unknown - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle on the Existential Import of Singular Sentences.Michael V. Wedin - 1978 - Phronesis 23 (2):179-196.
Added to index2009-08-28
Total downloads59 ( #86,390 of 2,152,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,037 of 2,152,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?