History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (2):131-150 (1990)
AbstractTwo main claims are defended. The first is that negative categorical statements are not to be accorded existential import insofar as they figure in the square of opposition. Against Kneale and others, it is argued that Aristotle formulates his o statements, for example, precisely to avoid existential commitment. This frees Aristotle's square from a recent charge of inconsistency. The second claim is that the logic proper provides much thinner evidence than has been supposed for what appears to be the received view, that is, for the view that insofar as they occur in syllogistic negative categoricals have existential import. At most there is a single piece of evidence in favor of the view?a special case of echthesis or the setting out of a case in proof
Similar books and articles
Aristotle on the Existential Import of Singular Sentences.Michael V. Wedin - 1978 - Phronesis 23 (2):179-196.
Square of Opposition.Author unknown - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotle’s Logic and the Quest for the Quantification of the Predicate.Bert Mosselmans - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):195-198.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Aristotle and Łukasiewicz on Existential Import.Stephen Read - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3):535--544.
Thinking About Contradictions: The Imaginary Logic of Nikolai Aleksandrovich Vasil’Ev.Venanzio Raspa - 2017 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
References found in this work
Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philological Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics.Günther Patzig - 1968 - Dordrecht: D. Reidel.