Hsun Tzu on family and familial relations

Asian Philosophy 17 (2):127 – 139 (2007)
Abstract
The Confucian tradition is often held to have accorded the family a prominent place in their ethics. This paper distinguishes three different senses in which the family is held to be primary in Confucian morality. It then explores Hsun Tzu's views on the family and familial relations. I argue that, while other early Confucians such as Confucius and Mencius would have held the family to be primary in all three senses, Hsun Tzu held the family to be primary in only one of the three senses. In particular, there is textual evidence that Hsun Tzu holds that one's primary obligation is to the ruler of the state, rather than to the immediate family.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552360701444995
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Confucius: The Analects.D. C. Lau (ed.) - 2000 - Columbia University Press.
What If the Father Commits a Crime?Rui Zhu - 2002 - Journal of the History of Ideas 63 (1):1-17.
Filial Piety as a Basis for Human Rights in Confucius and Mencius.John Schrecker - 1997 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24 (3):401-412.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
From Desire to Civility: Is Xunzi a Hobbesian?Kim Sungmoon - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (3):291-309.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
18 ( #290,669 of 2,210,836 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #114,901 of 2,210,836 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature