Underdetermination and incommensurability in contemporary epidemiology

Abstract
: In the shadowy world between philosophy of science and ethics lie the paired concepts of underdetermination and incommensurability. Typically, scientific evidence underdetermines the hypotheses tested in research studies, providing neither proof nor disproof. As a result, scientists must judge the weight of the evidence, and in doing so, bring scientific and extrascientific values to bear in their approaches to assessing and interpreting the evidence. When different scientists employ very different values, their views are said to be incommensurable. Less prominent differences represent partial incommensurabilities. The definitions and analyses provided by McMullin and by Veatch and Stempsey lay the foundation for the description of partial incommensurabilities in the current practice of assessing and interpreting epidemiologic evidence. This practice is called "causal inference" and is undertaken for the purpose of making causal conclusions and public health recommendations from population-based studies of exposures and diseases. Following the work of Bayley and Longino, several suggestions are examined for dealing with the partial incommensurabilities found in the general practice of causal inference in contemporary epidemiology. Two specific examples illustrate these ideas: studies on the relationship between induced abortion and breast cancer and those on the relationship between moderate alcohol consumption and breast cancer
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.1997.0018
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Seven Characteristics of Medical Evidence.Ross E. G. Upshur - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):93-97.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Underdetermination and the Explanation of Theory-Acceptance: A Response to Samir Okasha.Ward E. Jones - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):299 – 304.
Inferring Causation in Epidemiology: Mechanisms, Black Boxes, and Contrasts.Alex Broadbent - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press. pp. 45--69.
Underdetermination.Ernan McMullin - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):233-252.
Our World Views (May Be) Incommensurable: Now What?Carol Bayley - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):271-284.
Variational Causal Claims in Epidemiology.Federica Russo - 2009 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (4):540-554.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
132 ( #37,804 of 2,197,348 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,221 of 2,197,348 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature