Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1):43-60 (2012)
Abstract |
In recent years, citizens’ and civil society engagement with science and technology has become almost synonymous with participation in institutionally organized formats of participatory technology assessment such as consensus conferences or stakeholder dialogues. Contrary to this view, it is argued in the article that beyond these standardized models of “invited” participation, there exist various forms of “uninvited” and independent civil society engagement, which frequently not only have more significant impact but are profoundly democratically legitimate as well. Using the two examples of patient associations and environmental and consumer organizations in the field of nanotechnology, it is illustrated that interest-based civil society interventions do play an important role in the polycentric governance of science and technology. In conclusion, some implications for the activities of TA institutions and the design of novel TA procedures are outlined.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10202-012-0125-2 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Climate of Science-Art and the Art-Science of the Climate: Meeting Points, Boundary Objects and Boundary Work.Simone Rödder - 2017 - Minerva 55 (1):93-116.
Citizen science beyond invited participation: nineteenth century amateur naturalists, epistemic autonomy, and big data approaches avant la lettre.Dana Mahr & Sascha Dickel - 2019 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (4):1-19.
Critiquing Imaginaries of ‘the Public’ in UK Dialogue Around Animal Research: Insights From the Mass Observation Project.Renelle McGlacken & Pru Hobson-West - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91:280-287.
Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment.Lisa Herzog & Robert Lepenies - forthcoming - Minerva:1-20.
Similar books and articles
From Invited to Uninvited Participation (and Back?): Rethinking Civil Society Engagement in Technology Assessment and Development.Peter Wehling - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):43-60.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary On: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actors: Learning From Experiences Around Nanotechnology.Lotte Krabbenborg - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):907-922.
Participation Beyond Consensus? Technology Assessments, Consensus Conferences and Democratic Modulation.Jeroen Van Bouwel & Michiel Van Oudheusden - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (6):497-513.
Assessing Project Approval Procedures as Formalised Forms of Public Participation.Michael Zschiesche - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):145-156.
Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy. [REVIEW]Charles Thorpe - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):389-411.
Where Are the Missing Masses? The Quasi-Publics and Non-Publics of Technoscience.Shiju Sam Varughese - 2012 - Minerva 50 (2):239-254.
Current State and Prospects of Development of Civil Society Institutions in Ukraine.A. E. Liasota - 2018 - Granì 21 (10):142-148.
Challenges to Public Engagement in Science and Technology in Japan: Experiences in the HapMap Project.Eiko Suda, Darryl Macer & Ichiro Matsuda - 2009 - Genomics, Society and Policy 5 (1):114-133.
Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy.Thomas Saretzki - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment.Michiel van Oudheusden - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):673-690.
Why Do We Still Need Participatory Technology Assessment?Leonhard Hennen - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41.
A Citizens' Conference on Gene Therapy in Japan: A Feasibility Study of the Consensus Conference Method in Japan. [REVIEW]Yukio Wakamatsu - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):22-43.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-12-21
Total views
2 ( #1,452,994 of 2,518,477 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,477 )
2019-12-21
Total views
2 ( #1,452,994 of 2,518,477 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,477 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads