In Godehard Link (ed.), One Hundred Years of Russell’s Paradox. de Gruyter (2004)

Authors
Kai Wehmeier
University of California, Irvine
Abstract
We provide an overview of consistent fragments of the theory of Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik that arise by restricting the second-order comprehension schema. We discuss how such theories avoid inconsistency and show how the reasoning underlying Russell’s paradox can be put to use in an investigation of these fragments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,486
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Saving Frege From Contradiction.George Boolos - 1987 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87:137--151.
On the Consistency of the First-Order Portion of Frege's Logical System.Terence Parsons - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1):161-168.
Whence the Contradiction?George Boolos - 1993 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:211--233.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap.Joseph Levine - 1983 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (October):354-61.
Comparing Peano Arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume’s Principle.Sean Walsh - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
32 ( #326,459 of 2,421,433 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,098 of 2,421,433 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes