Classical Quarterly 31 (2):287-304 (1981)

Authors
Roslyn Weiss
Lehigh University
Abstract
This paper is an attempt so to construe the arguments of the Hippias Minor as to remove the justification for regarding it as unworthy of Plato either because of its alleged fallaciousness and Sophistic mode of argument or because of its alleged immorality. It focuses, therefore, only on the arguments and their conclusions, steering clear of the dialogue's dramatic and literary aspects. Whereas I do not wish to deny the importance of these aspects to a proper understanding of the dialogue – on the contrary, in a dialogue so heavily laden with irony and caricature, these aspects are necessarily more significant than they are in other dialogues – I do think there is something to be gained from concentrating on the arguments themselves. Although there can be little doubt that Socrates is up to something in the Hippias Minor, the task of determining just what he is up to can only be simplified by clarifying the arguments first. The Hippias Minor has traditionally been thought to contain two independent arguments, each having its own paradoxical conclusion. The first argument begins, it is said, when Hippias characterizes the two Homeric heroes Achilles and Odysseus as the true man and the false man respectively. Through its discovery that both the false man and the true man have δύναμις, it results in the paradox that the false man and the true are identical. The second argument, on this view, leaves the subject of ληθς and ψευδς and compares instead all sorts of agents in intentional and unintentional action. Finding that the intentional agent is in every case better than the unintentional, the argument concludes that the intentional evil-doer is also better than the unintentional. Viewing the dialogue as thus containing two distinct topics treated in two self-sufficient arguments is perhaps not the best way to understand it
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838800009605
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plato's Earlier Dialectic.Jason Xenakis - 1955 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (3):436-437.
Plato's Lesser Hippias.Robert G. Hoerber - 1962 - Phronesis 7 (2):121 - 131.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hipias Menor.Sergio Ariza - 2017 - Ideas Y Valores 66 (163):333-354.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Platon. Hippias Maior. Hippias Minor. [REVIEW]Marcel Meulder - 1998 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 76 (1):229-230.
Hippias Maior: Hippias Minor.Bruno Plato & Vancamp - 1996 - Franz Steiner Verlag.
The moral intellectualism of Plato’s Socrates.Oded Balaban - 2008 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):1-14.
Gadamer and the Lessons of Arithmetic in Plato’s Hippias Major.John V. Garner - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (1):105-136.
Platonis Hippias minor.Oscar Kraus - 1913 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 76 (6):314-315.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total views
39 ( #280,985 of 2,462,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,852 of 2,462,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes