Hume Studies 34 (2):169-187 (2008)

Authors
Ruth Weintraub
Tel Aviv University
Abstract
According to Hume, the paradigm type of inductive reasoning involves a constant conjunction. But, as Price points out, Hume misrepresents ordinary induction: we experience very few constant conjunctions. In this paper, I examine several ways of defending Hume’s account of our practice against Price’s objection, and conclude that the theory cannot be upheld.
Keywords Hume  induction
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0319-7336
DOI hume20083429
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,496
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Was Hume's Contribution to the Problem of Induction?Ruth Weintraub - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):460-470.
A New Humean Criticism of Our Inductive Practice.Ruth Weintraub - 2013 - The European Legacy 18 (4):420-431.
Waiting for Hume.Peter Lipton - 2005 - In Marina Frasca-Spada & P. J. E. Kail (eds.), Impressions of Hume. Oxford University Press. pp. 59.
Hume's Two Assumptions.Nathan Stemmer - 1988 - Dialectica 42 (2):93-104.
Hume Is Not A Skeptic About Induction.Xinli Wang - 2001 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 36 (78):41-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-16

Total views
173 ( #60,226 of 2,446,367 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,608 of 2,446,367 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes