Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):280-281 (2002)

Paul Weirich
University of Missouri, Columbia
Rachlin favors following patterns over making decisions case by case. However, his accounts of self-control and altruism do not establish the rationality of making decisions according to patterns. The best arguments for using patterns as a standard of evaluation appeal to savings in cognitive costs and compensation for irrational dispositions. What the arguments show depends on how they are elaborated and refined.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x0254005x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Fundamental Principle of Practical Reasoning.Ralph Wedgwood - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (2):189 – 209.
Extraneous Intrusions in Moral Temptation Can Switch Decisions.Percy Black - 1993 - Journal of Moral Education 22 (2):139-156.
Expected Utility and Risk.Paul Weirich - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):419-442.
Arguing for Majority Rule.Mathias Risse - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):41–64.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #952,797 of 2,420,781 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,246 of 2,420,781 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes