Philosophy 80 (4):585-593 (2005)
The paper aims to explain and illustrate why Einstein and Kant, relativity and transcendental idealism, came to be discussed in one breath after the Special theory of relativity had emerged in 1905. There are essentially three points of contact between the theory of relativity and Kant's objective idealism. The Special theory makes contact with Kantian views of time; the General theory requires a non-Kantian view of geometry; but both relativity theories endorse a quasi-Kantian view of the nature of scientific knowledge. The paper shows that Einstein is a Kantian in his insistence on the synthesis of rationalism and empiricism, but not in the details of his physics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why Special Relativity Should Not Be a Template for a Fundamental Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics.Harvey R. Brown & Christopher G. Timpson - unknown
Einstein's Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion.Steven Gimbel - 2012 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and the Problems in the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies That Led Him to It.John Norton - unknown
Time in Philosophy and in Physics: From Kant and Einstein to Gödel.Hao Wang - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):215 - 234.
Induction and Scientific Realism: Einstein Versus Van Fraassen Part Three: Einstein, Aim-Oriented Empiricism and the Discovery of Special and General Relativity.Nicholas Maxwell - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):275-305.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #58,876 of 2,158,189 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #46,483 of 2,158,189 )
How can I increase my downloads?