Metaphysics after Pragmatism

Review of Metaphysics 42 (3):513 - 546 (1989)

Abstract
ONE ASSUMPTION ABOUT METAPHYSICS is often shared by those who renounce it. Metaphysical theories are not true, they say, because of being neither true nor false. Opponents of one sort excoriate the theories as meaningless. Others say that truth and falsity are irrelevant to metaphysics, as they are to literature. Like novelists and playwrights, we metaphysicians are said to formulate the stories used for thinking about possible worlds, such as the imaginary ones of fiction and this actual world. Metaphysics, this implies, differs from literature only because its stories have a wider scope. Where novelists devote themselves to incidents and personalities, we metaphysicians tell stories that emphasize the categorial features of a world. Either way, these activities are motivated by a single objective: we formulate interpretations in order to use them for creating thinkable worlds. All of the intelligibility credited to any possible world--all its differentiations and relations--originate within these interpretations. But no one should suppose that interpretations are true or false; for these conceptualizations are not the representations of preexisting states of affairs. They are, instead, the very condition for the existence of possible worlds. Why? Because these worlds exist only as they are prefigured within, and created by, the interpretations used for thinking them.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph19894235
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Three Types of American Neo-Pragmatism.Jon Avery - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:1-13.
Review of Sidney Hook, The Metaphysics of Pragmatism. [REVIEW]H. G. Callaway - 1997 - Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society 33 (No. 3):799-808.
Pragmatism, Truth, and Inquiry.Chase B. Wrenn - 2005 - Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (1):95-113.
Pragmatism, Realism, and Religion.Michael R. Slater - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681.
Pragmatist Metaphysics: An Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology.Megan Doherty - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (3):281-285.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
19 ( #491,971 of 2,289,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #842,814 of 2,289,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature