Monitoring Clinical Research: An Obligation Unfulfilled

Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario
The revelation that data obtained for the US-based National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) from subjects enrolled at Hôpital Saint-Luc in Montreal was falsified has eroded public trust in research. Institutions can educate researchers and help prevent unethical research practices by establishing procedures to monitor research involving human subjects. Research monitoring encompasses four categories of activity: annual reviews of continuing research, monitoring of informed consent, monitoring of adherence to approved protocols and monitoring of the integrity of data. The authors describe characteristics of research projects that may call for monitoring procedures in each category. The form taken by such monitoring depends on the nature of the protocol. Although appropriate research monitoring requires substantial investment of personnel and financial resources, it is required under guidelines regulating research involving human subjects in Canada. Research monitoring is a step forward in re-establishing public confidence in medical research
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,878
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Data and Safety Monitoring Boards: Some Enduring Questions.Charles J. Kowalski & Jan L. Hewett - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):496-506.
Data and Safety Monitoring Boards: Some Enduring Questions.Charles J. Kowalski & Jan L. Hewett - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):496-506.
Views and Experiences of IRBs Concerning Research Integrity.Robert Klitzman - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):513-528.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflections on Governance Models for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells.Jeremy Sugarman - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):251-256.
Monitoring Research with Human Subjects.J. Sugarman - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):242-242.
The Same-Order Monitoring Theory of Consciousness.Uriah Kriegel - 2006 - In Uriah Kriegel & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. MIT Press. pp. 143--170.
Metacognition and Consciousness.Asher Koriat - 2007 - In P D Zelazo, M Moscovitch & E Thompson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Animals Show Monitoring, but Does Monitoring Imply Awareness?Giuliana Mazzoni - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):349-350.
Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet.Seumas Miller & John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #437,878 of 2,319,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #778,114 of 2,319,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature