Means, ends, and public ignorance in Habermas's theory of democracy

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):23-58 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the principles derived from his theory of discourse ethics, Habermas's model of deliberative democracy is justified only if the public is capable of making political decisions that advance the common good. Recent public‐opinion research demonstrates that the public's overwhelming ignorance of politics precludes it from having such capabilities, even if radical measures were taken to thoroughly educate the public about politics or to increase the salience of politics in their lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does public ignorance defeat deliberative democracy? [REVIEW]Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.
Habermas vs. Weber on democracy.Reihan Salam - 2001 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):59-85.
Democracy despite voter ignorance: A Weberian reply to Somin and Friedman.David Ciepley - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):191-227.
Dishonesty, Ignorance, or What?Paul T. Menzel - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (2):16-17.
Habermas II.David M. Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.) - 2010 - Los Angeles: SAGE.
The Respect Fallacy: Limits of Respect in Public Dialogue.Italo Testa - 2012 - In Christian Kock & Lisa Villadsen (ed.), Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation. Pennsylvania State University Press.
The (severe) limits of deliberative democracy as the basis for political choice.Gerald F. Gaus - 2008 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 55 (117):26-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
41 (#377,987)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance.Jeffrey Friedman - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-58.
Ignorance as a starting point: From modest epistemology to realistic political theory.Jeffrey Friedman - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):1-22.
Ignorance as a Starting Point: From Modest Epistemology to Realistic Political Theory.Jeffrey Friedman - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):1-22.
Habermas vs. Weber on democracy.Reihan Salam - 2001 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):59-85.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations