Neo-Fregeanism: An Embarrassment of Riches

Abstract
Neo-Fregeans argue that substantial mathematics can be derived from a priori abstraction principles, Hume's Principle connecting numerical identities with one:one correspondences being a prominent example. The embarrassment of riches objection is that there is a plurality of consistent but pairwise inconsistent abstraction principles, thus not all consistent abstractions can be true. This paper considers and criticizes various further criteria on acceptable abstractions proposed by Wright settling on another one—stability—as the best bet for neo-Fregeans. However, an analogue of the embarrassment of riches objection resurfaces in the metatheory and I conclude by arguing that the neo-Fregean program, at least insofar as it includes a platonistic ontology, is fatally wounded by it
Keywords neologicism   Frege   abstraction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1082637613
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,813
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction.R. T. Cook - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):673-696.
Bad Company and Neo-Fregean Philosophy.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):393-414.
Notions of Invariance for Abstraction Principles.G. A. Antonelli - 2010 - Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):276-292.
Which Abstraction Principles Are Acceptable? Some Limitative Results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Aristotelian Logic, Axioms, and Abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):195-202.
Frege Meets Dedekind: A Neologicist Treatment of Real Analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
An Embarrassment of Riches.Mary Terrall - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):185-190.
Neo‐Fregeanism and Quantifier Variance.Katherine Hawley - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):233 - 249.
Which Abstraction Principles Are Acceptable? Some Limitative Results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
48 ( #112,768 of 2,202,698 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #44,528 of 2,202,698 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature