Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):389-411 (1996)

Authors
Daniel Marc Weinstock
Université de Montréal
Abstract
My intention in this essay will be to explore the role that consent-based arguments perform in Kant's political and legal philosophy. I want to uncover the extent to which Kant considered that the legitimacy of the State and of its laws depends upon the outcome of intersubjective deliberation. Commentators have divided over the following question: Is Kant best viewed as a member of the social contract tradition, according to which the legitimacy of the state and of the laws it promulgates derives from the consent of those people over whom it claims authority, or should he be read as having put forward a secularized version of natural law theory, according to which the state and its laws are legitimate to the extent that they are attained by standards of sound reason and supported by an objective account of the human good?
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1080/00455091.1996.10717459
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.Stephen Mulhall - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):542-545.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.Richard Tuck - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (124):282-284.
The Idea Of An Overlapping Consensus.John Rawls - 1987 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7 (1):1-25.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Thomas E. Hill - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (1):47.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant’s Universalism Versus Pragmatism.Hemmo Laiho - 2019 - In Krzysztof Skowroński & Sami Pihlström (eds.), Pragmatist Kant—Pragmatism, Kant, and Kantianism in the Twenty-first Century. Helsinki, Finland: pp. 60-75.
How Not to Bridge the Gap: Cummiskey on Kantian Consequentialism.Daniel M. Weinstock - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):315-339.
Critical Notice.Daniel M. Weinstock - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):315-339.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Enlightenment and Freedom.Jonathan Peterson - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 223-244.
Reason and Revelation: Kant and the Problem of Authority. [REVIEW]Phil Enns - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):103 - 114.
Public Reason and Democracy.Andrew Lister - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):273-289.
Rethinking Kant as a Public Intellectual. [REVIEW]Sofie Møller - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 16 (1).
Rawls and Kant on the Public Use of Reason.K. Koukouzelis - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (7):841-868.
The Completeness of Public Reason.Micah Schwartzman - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):191-220.
The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant.Susan Neiman - 1994 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
51 ( #187,254 of 2,348,868 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #186,326 of 2,348,868 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes