Toward a moral theory of negligence law

Law and Philosophy 2 (1):37 - 62 (1983)
This paper explores how the widely acknowledged conception of tort law as corrective justice is to be applied to the law of negligence. Corrective justice is an ordering of transactions between two parties which restores them to an antecedent equality. It is thus incompatible with the comprehensive aggregation of utilitarianism, and it stands in easy harmony with Kantian moral notions. This conception of negligence law excludes both maximizing theories, such as Holmes' and Posner's, and Fried's risk pool, which combines Kantianism with distributive rather than corrective justice.Central to the Kantian approach is the impermissibility of self-preference. The two types of self-preference, self-preference in conception and self-preference in action can respectively account for the objective standard and the Learned Hand test, which are the two most characteristic features of negligence and which are generally (and wrongly) considered to be inescapably aggregative. This corrective justice conception of the negligence standard can then be compared to Epstein's corrective justice conception of strict liability, and arguments can be offered in favour of the superiority of the former.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00145312
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,208
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Aristotle's Forms of Justice.Ernest J. Weinrib - 1989 - Ratio Juris 2 (3):211-226.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is Not a Duty “To Try”.Ori J. Herstein - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):403-428.
A Causal Theory of Negligence.Randall R. Curren - 1992 - Social Philosophy Today 7:111-124.
Responsibility and the Negligence Standard.Joseph Raz - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):1-18.
Aristotle and Posner on Corrective Justice.William Martin - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4):651-657.
Tort Law and Corrective Justice.H. Sheinman - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (1):21-73.
Negligence.Kenneth W. Simons - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2):52.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

95 ( #53,659 of 2,164,552 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,486 of 2,164,552 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums