The credibility of miracles

Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375 (1996)
Hume’s famous argument against the credibility of testimony about miracles invokes two premises: 1) The reliability of the witness (the extent to which he is informed and truthful) must be compared with the intrinsic probability of the miracle. 2) The initial probability of a miracle is always small enough to outweigh the improbability that the testimony is false (even when the witness is assumed to be reliable). I defend the first premise of the argument, showing that Hume’s argument can be applied to purported observations of miracles, as well. I then show that Hume failed to provide an adequate support for his second premise. A more cogent defence can be provided for a weaker premise. The resultant argument has, consequently, a less sweeping conclusion than Hume’s
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00355313
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,478
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.
The Dialogue of Reason.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1986 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Miracles, Historical Testimonies, and Probabilities.Aviezer Tucker - 2005 - History and Theory 44 (3):373–390.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Locke on Competing Miracles.Travis Dumsday - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):416-424.
Martin on Miracles.Michael Almeida - 2007 - Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Hume's Theory of the Credibility of Miracles.C. D. Broad - 1916 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17:77 - 94.
Miracles and Credibility.Robert Young - 1980 - Religious Studies 16 (4):465 - 468.
Bayesian Analyses of Hume's Argument Concerning Miracles.Michael Levine - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):101-106.
The Curious Case of Mr. Locke's Miracles.T. Brian Mooney & Anthony Imbrosciano - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (3):147 - 168.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
32 ( #163,340 of 2,180,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,018 of 2,180,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums