The Ethical Analysis of Risks and Potential Benefits in Human Subjects Research: History, Theory, and Implications for U.S. Regulation
This paper addresses three questions central to the ethical analysis of risks and potential benefits in human subjects research: 1. How was the ethical analysis of risk understood by the members of the U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission)? 2. What conceptual framework should guide the ethical analysis of risk? 3. What changes to U.S. regulations would the implementation of such a framework require?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Refuting the Net Risks Test: A Response to Wendler and Miller's "Assessing Research Risks Systematically".Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):487-490.
Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where Are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What?Ari VanderWalde & Seth Kurzban - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):543-558.
Benefits to Research Subjects in International Trials: Do They Reduce Exploitation or Increase Undue Inducement?Angela Ballantyne - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):178-191.
U.S. Federal Regulations for Emergency Research: A Practical Guide and Commentary.Andrew McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
Which Benefits of Research Participation Count as 'Direct'?Alexander Friedman, Emily Robbins & David Wendler - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (2):60-67.
Misconceptions About Coercion and Undue Influence: Reflections on the Views of Irb Members.Emily Largent, Christine Grady, Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (9):500-507.
When Are Research Risks Reasonable in Relation to Anticipated Benefits?Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller - unknown
Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception From Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer - unknown
The Responsible Conduct of Basic and Clinical Research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
Protecting People in Research: A Comparison Between Biomedical and Traffic Research. [REVIEW]Sara Svensson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):99-115.
Human and Animal Research Guidelines: Aligning Ethical Constructs with New Scientific Developments.Hope Ferdowsian - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (8):472-478.
Non-Beneficial Pediatric Research and the Best Interests Standard: A Legal and Ethical Reconciliation.Paul Litton - unknown
Report on the National Commission: Good as Gold. [REVIEW]George J. Annas - 1980 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 8 (6):4-4.
Added to index2010-09-08
Total downloads28 ( #182,842 of 2,168,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?