Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):615-661 (2009)

The American regulatory model of corporate governance rests on the theory of self-regulation as␣the most effective and efficient means to achieve corporate self-restraint in the marketplace. However, that model fails to achieve regular compliance with baseline ethical and legal behaviors as evidenced by a century of repeated corporate debacles, the most recent being Enron, WorldCom, and Refco. Seemingly impervious to its domestic failure, Congress imprinted the same self-regulation paradigm on legislation restraining global business behavior, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. This anti-bribery initiative prohibits unethical and illegal payments made to foreign public officials in an effort to eradicate bribery as a rational-choice global market entry strategy. However, this paper illustrates, using newly complied statistics from 1977 to 2008, that the FCPA has not had a dramatic impact on U.S. global corporate behavior despite its recent high profile coverage and the tough regulatory rhetoric about corporate compliance. The paper also extends the prior Cragg and Woof FCPA efficiency study and provides current empirical evidence to resolve several unanswered questions raised by that earlier study.
Keywords corporate governance  Foreign Corrupt Practices Act  global ethics  bribery  self-regulation  Rational-choice theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9966-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Dover Publications.
Integrating Ethics Into Management.Domènec Melé - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3):291-297.
Is Self-Identity Image Advertising Ethical?John Douglas Bishop - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):371-398.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Governance in a Risk Society.Anselm Schneider & Andreas Georg Scherer - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 126 (2):1-15.
Corporate Governance and Trust in Business: A Matter of Balance.G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Legal and Moral Analysis. [REVIEW]Bill Shaw - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):789 - 795.
Securities Market and Corporate Governance of Privatised Firms.Viet Ha Hoang - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
U.S. Efforts to Combat Foreign Corrupt Practices.Thomas J. White - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):263-268.
Corporate Responsibility as an Arena for Partnered Governance.Atle Midttun - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:222-227.
Corporate Governance in Mexico.Bryan W. Husted & Carlos Serrano - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):337 - 348.
Corporate Governance in Brazil.Flávio M. Rabelo & Flávio C. Vasconcelos - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):321 - 335.
Corporate Governance in Developing Economies the Case of Egypt.Jennifer Bremer & Nabil Elias - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):430-445.
Theorising South Africa’s Corporate Governance.Andrew West - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):433 - 448.


Added to PP index

Total views
140 ( #73,593 of 61,029 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,499 of 61,029 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes