Synthese 106 (2):241 - 251 (1996)

David Albert and Barry Loewer have proposed a new interpretation of quantum mechanics which they call the Many Minds interpretation, according to which there are infinitely many minds associated with a given (physical) state of a brain. This interpretation is related to the family of many worlds interpretations insofar as it assumes strictly unitary (Schrödinger) time-evolution of quantum-mechanical systems (no reduction of the wave-packet). The Many Minds interpretation itself is principally motivated by an argument which purports to show that the assumption of unitary evolution, along with some common sense assumptions about mental states (specifically, beliefs) leads to a certain nonphysicalism, in which there is a many-to-one correspondence between minds and brains. In this paper, I critically examine this motivating argument, and show that it depends on a mistaken assumption regarding the correspondence between projection operators and yes/no questions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1996
DOI 10.1007/BF00413702
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,160
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory.H. D. Zeh - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (1):69-76.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
135 ( #79,978 of 2,454,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,241 of 2,454,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes