Abstract
Negotiation analysis is a branch of mathematical decision theory involving a dialectical rationality standard for the resolution of dissensus. Negotiations are settings of group decision making where people cooperate to arrive at a joint decision representing a mutually acceptable solution of the negotiation problem. Criteria of what is mutually acceptable can be regarded as common grounds. They serve as stopping conditions for the argumentation process during negotiation. Fairness and efficiency are examples.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,016
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Negotiation, Persuasion and Argument.Chris Provis - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):95-112.
Negotiation and Defeasible Decision Making.Fernando Tohmé - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):289-311.
The Concept of Negotiation in Shared Decision Making.Lars Sandman - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (3):236-243.
Persuasive Argumentation in Negotiation.Katia P. Sycara - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (3):203-242.
Constructivist Negotiation Ethics.Warren French, Christian Häßlein & Robert van Es - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):83 - 90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
23 ( #448,759 of 2,403,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,211 of 2,403,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes