In Craig Lundy & Daniella Voss (eds.), At the Edges of Thought: Deleuze and Post-Kantian Philosophy. Edinburgh, UK: pp. 213-252 (2015)

Authors
Alistair Welchman
University of Texas at San Antonio
Abstract
Deleuze does not mention Schopenhauer very frequently. Certainly Schopenhauer does not appear to be in the counter-canon of life-affirming philosophers that Deleuze so values – indeed, far from it. Nor does he appear to be even a favoured ‘enemy’ as he describes Kant, or as he sometimes appears to view Hegel. Nevertheless, I think Schopenhauer’s break from Kant is crucial for understanding not only Deleuze’s account of Nietzsche, but also for a proper grasp of the core Deleuzian distinction between the actual and the virtual, at least in its guise as the distinction between desiring-production and social production in Anti-Oedipus.
Keywords Schopenhauer  Deleuze  Kant  Desire  Tragedy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deleuze's Conception of Desire.Jihai Gao - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (3):406-420.
Schopenhauer on Aesthetic Understanding and the Values of Art.Bart Vandenabeele - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):194-210.
Deleuze's Use of Kant's Argument From Incongruent Counterparts.Henry Somers-Hall - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):345-366.
Transcendental Empiricism? : Deleuze's Reading of Hume.Martin Bell - 2005 - In Marina Frasca-Spada & P. J. E. Kail (eds.), Impressions of Hume. Oxford University Press.
Schopenhauer.Robert J. Wicks - 2008 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Schopenhauer and Kant.Peter Welsen - 2005 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3):757-772.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-29

Total views
47 ( #213,694 of 2,411,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #16,506 of 2,411,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes