Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15 (1) (2019)
AbstractMassimo Renzo has recently argued in this journal that Allen Buchanan’s account of the ethics of intervention is too permissive. Renzo claims that a proper understanding of political self-determination shows that it is often impermissible to intervene in order to establish a regime that leads to more self-determination for a group of people if that group was or would be opposed to the intervention. Renzo’s argument rests on an analogy between individual self-determination and group self-determination, and once we see that there are differences between the two kinds of self-determination, his argument against Buchanan fails, and thus there are more cases of permissible intervention than Renzo countenances. However, understanding these differences also reveals that Buchanan’s account is also not permissive enough. There are cases of justified intervention beyond even what Buchanan compasses.
Similar books and articles
Institutional Morality and the Principle of National Self-Determination.Hsin-wen Lee - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (1):207-226.
Reconciling Just Causes for Armed Humanitarian Intervention.Eamon Aloyo - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):313-328.
Intervention and Collective Self-Determination.Jeff McMahan - 1996 - Ethics and International Affairs 10:1–24.
Justifying Humanitarian Intervention to the People Who Pay For It.Ned Dobos - 2008 - Praxis 1 (1).
Secession as a Remedial Right.Michel Seymour - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):395 – 423.
Secession, State Breakdown, and Humanitarian Intervention.Allen Buchanan - 2003 - In Dean Chatterjee & Donald Scheid (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention. Cambridge University Press. pp. 189--211.
Are Institutions and Empiricism Enough? [REVIEW]Matthew J. Lister - 2011 - Transnational Legal Theory 2 (1).
The Ethics of Revolution and Its Implications for the Ethics of Intervention.Allen Buchanan - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (4):291-323.
Referential Intentions: A Response to Buchanan and Peet.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):610-615.
In Defense of Discretionary Association Theories of Political Legitimacy: Reply to Buchanan.Marcus Arvan - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (2):1-6.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Colonialism, Injustices of the Past, and the Hole in Nine.Daniel Weltman - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-13.
References found in this work
Political Theory and International Relations.Charles R. Beitz - 1979 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law.Allen E. Buchanan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.