Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):410-418 (2020)

Authors
Daniel Weltman
Ashoka University
Abstract
Piero Moraro argues that people who engage in civil disobedience do not have a pro tanto reason to accept punishment for breaking the law, although they do have a duty to undergo prosecution. This is because they have a duty to answer for their actions, and the state serves as an agent of the people by calling the lawbreaker to answer via prosecution. I argue that Moraro does not go far enough. Someone who engages in civil disobedience does not even have to show up for the trial, provided that they answer for their actions adequately via some other means. This is because sometimes states are not agents of the people who can call lawbreakers to account, and even those states which are agents cannot demand that lawbreakers answer for their crimes in the form of a trial.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/pq/pqz028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Recent Theories of Civil Disobedience: An Anti‐Legal Turn?William E. Scheuerman - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (4):427-449.
On (Not) Accepting the Punishment for Civil Disobedience.Piero Moraro - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):503-520.
Penalizing Public Disobedience.Kimberley Brownlee - 2008 - Ethics 118 (4):711-716.
Reclaiming the Revolutionary Spirit.William Smith - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (2):149-166.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justifying Uncivil Disobedience.Ten-Herng Lai - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 5:90-114.
On (Not) Accepting the Punishment for Civil Disobedience.Piero Moraro - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):503-520.
The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience.John Morreall - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):35 - 47.
Civil Disobedience.Candice Delmas - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (11):681-691.
Cyber Disobedience: When is Hacktivism Civil Disobedience?Brian J. Huschle - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):69-83.
Civil Disobedience: A Philosophical Overview.Piero Moraro - 2019 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
Rawls and Gandhi on Civil Disobedience.Vinit Haksar - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):151 – 192.
Samaritanism and Civil Disobedience.Candice Delmas - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (3):295-313.
Ecosabotage and Civil Disobedience.Michael Martin - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.
Ecosabotage and Civil Disobedience.Michael Martin - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.
The Justifiability of Civil Disobedience.Michael Bayles - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (1):3 - 20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-04-02

Total views
11 ( #769,312 of 2,348,331 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #147,956 of 2,348,331 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes