The Path to Gun Control in America Goes through Political Philosophy

Public Philosophy Journal 2 (1) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This essay argues that gun control in America is a philosophical as well as a policy debate. This explains the depth of acrimony it causes. It also explains why the technocratic public health argument favored by the gun control movement has been so unsuccessful in persuading opponents and motivating supporters. My analysis also yields some positive advice for advocates of gun control: take the political philosophy of the gun rights movement seriously and take up the challenge of showing that a society without guns is a better society, not merely a safer one.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Debating Gun Control: How Much Regulation Do We Need?David DeGrazia & Lester H. Hunt - 2016 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Gun Violence as Industrial Pollution.Thomas Metcalf - 2018 - Public Affairs Quarterly 32 (2).
The Case for Moderate Gun Control.David DeGrazia - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (1):1-25.
In Defense of Gun Control.Hugh LaFollette - 2018 - New York, USA: Oup Usa.
Gun Control.Lance Stell - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 192–209.
Gun Control: A European Perspective.Vincent C. Müller - 2015 - Essays in Philosophy 16 (2):247-261.
Limited Government and Gun Control.Howard Ponzer - 2015 - Essays in Philosophy 16 (2):204-216.


Added to PP

881 (#17,525)

6 months
110 (#43,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references