What Adam Smith Really Thought Should Not Matter

Business Ethics Journal Review 7 (7):40-46 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Hühn and Dierksmeier argue that a better understanding of Adam Smith’s work would improve business ethics research and education. I worry that their approach encourages two scholarly sins. First, anachronistic historiography in which we distort Smith’s ideas by making him answer questions about contemporary debates in CSR theory. Second, treating him as a prophet by assuming that finding out what Smith would have thought about it is the right way to answer such questions.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Adam Smith Really Thought Should Not Matter.T. M. Wells - forthcoming - Business Ethics Journal Review:40-46.
Adam Smith, Ethicist.Christina McRorie - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (4):674-696.
Adam Smith's Legacy for Ethics and Economics.Patricia Hogue Werhane - 1997 - Judge Institute of Management Studies.
Adam Smith and the New Right.Craig Smith - 2013 - In Christopher J. Berry, Maria Pia Paganelli & Craig Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

19 (#825,863)

6 months
9 (#355,374)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?