What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?

Biology and Philosophy 32 (2):263-279 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There have been periodic claims that evolutionary biology needs urgent reform, and this article tries to account for the volume and persistence of this discontent. It is argued that a few inescapable properties of the field make it prone to criticisms of predictable kinds, whether or not the criticisms have any merit. For example, the variety of living things and the complexity of evolution make it easy to generate data that seem revolutionary, and lead to disappointment with existing explanatory frameworks. It is then argued that special discontent stems from misunderstandings and dislike of one well-known but atypical research programme: the study of adaptive function, in the tradition of behavioural ecology. To achieve its goals, this research needs distinct tools, often including imaginary agency, and a partial description of the evolutionary process. This invites mistaken charges of narrowness and oversimplification, and these chime with anxieties about human agency and overall purpose. The article ends by discussing several ways in which calls to reform evolutionary biology actively hinder progress in the field.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Evolutionary Biology Presently Pervades Cell and Molecular Biology.Michel Morange - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):113 - 120.
Is it a revolution?Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):429-437.
Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Chance as an Explanatory Factor in Evolutionary Biology.Timothy Shanahan - 1991 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 13 (2):249 - 268.
Karl Popper's philosophy of biology.Michael Ruse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):638-661.
Evolutionary epistemology as science.H. C. Plotkin - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):295-313.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-21

Downloads
48 (#291,517)

6 months
4 (#315,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Welch
Brigham Young University