In Christian F. Rostboll & Theresa Scavenius (eds.), Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory. London: Routledge. pp. 50-62 (2017)

Authors
Fabian Wendt
Chapman University
Abstract
The article defends the claim that if some laws are (or would be) widely accepted, this provides pro tanto moral reasons to support these laws and not to support otherwise better laws that are not widely accepted. In that sense the value of having widely accepted laws provides moral reasons to make compromises in politics, and it justifies a modest and qualified status quo bias. Widely accepted laws are valuable because they reduce enforcement costs, have symbolic value, help to maintain peace, and realize the value of non-subjugation.
Keywords Compromise  Acceptance  Law  Status Quo Bias  Non-Subjugation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Parental Compromise.Marcus William Hunt - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
In Defense of Unfair Compromises.Fabian Wendt - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (11):2855-2875.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Laws and Modal Realism.Robert Pargetter - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (3):335-347.
Benbaji on Killing in War and 'the War Convention'.Uwe Steinhoff - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):616-623.
Chemists Versus Philosophers Regarding Laws of Nature.Maureen Christie - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25:613-629.
Evolution, Progress, and the Laws of Dialectics.M. N. Rutkevich - 1965 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 4 (3):34-43.
Contractarianism and Animal Rights.Mark Rowlands - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (3):235–247.
Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion: 1609–1666.J. L. Russell - 1964 - British Journal for the History of Science 2 (1):1-24.
On the Status of Social Laws.Friedel Weinert - 1997 - Dialectica 51 (3):225–242.
On the Status of Social Laws.Friedel Weinert - 1997 - Dialectica 51 (3):225-242.
How Moral Disagreement May Ground Principled Moral Compromise.Klemens Kappel - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (1):75-96.
Can a Compromise Be Fair?P. Jones & I. O'Flynn - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):115-135.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-06

Total views
18 ( #529,682 of 2,326,023 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #214,458 of 2,326,023 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes