Hastings Center Report 35 (5):37-43 (2005)
Abstract |
: When children and incapacitated adults are enrolled in research that cannot directly benefit them, they can be exposed to no more than "minimal" risks, according to guidelines accepted around the world. We need a new standard for what "minimal" risks are, howeve--one that recognizes that participating in nonbeneficial research is like participating in a charitable activity. Such a standard appears likely to provide more stringent protections for these vulnerable populations
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1353/hcr.2005.0087 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Minimal Risk Threshold in Research With Children.Ariella Binik - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):3-12.
Should Protections for Research with Humans Who Cannot Consent Apply to Research with Nonhuman Primates?David Wendler - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):157-173.
Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Vulnerable Populations in Research: The Case of the Seriously Ill.Philip J. Nickel - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):245-264.
Is There an Objective Way to Compare Research Risks?John Rossi & Robert M. Nelson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):423-427.
View all 13 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Interpretation of the Subjects' Condition Requirement: A Legal Perspective.Seema Shah & David Wendler - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):365-373.
Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
On the Need for Improved Protections of Incapacitated and Non-Benefiting Research Subjects.Stefan Eriksson - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (1):15-21.
Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking The.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception From Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer - unknown
Children's Capacity to Agree to Psychological Research: Knowledge of Risks and Benefits and Voluntariness.Rona Abramovitch, Jonathan L. Freedman, Kate Henry & Michelle Van Brunschot - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):25 – 48.
Eliminating the Daily Life Risks Standard From the Definition of Minimal Risk.D. B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (1):35-38.
Which Benefits of Research Participation Count as 'Direct'?Alexander Friedman, Emily Robbins & David Wendler - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (2):60-67.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
45 ( #226,371 of 2,420,360 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #248,862 of 2,420,360 )
2009-01-28
Total views
45 ( #226,371 of 2,420,360 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #248,862 of 2,420,360 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads